Talk:Huang–Lao

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Taoism (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taoism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaoismWikipedia:WikiProject TaoismTemplate:WikiProject TaoismTaoism articles

Philosophy: Eastern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Eastern philosophy

Empress Dowager Dou?

Did Huang-Lao really regained favor during 88-92 CE when Empress Dou ruled as dowager or is there a confusion with this Empress Dou?. 118.165.195.229 (talk) 11:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's the latter Empress Dou (the much earlier one in time). 98.115.255.240 (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing a very important study (probably because it's in German)

Covers roughly the same ground as the paper by van Ess that's cited here, but more rigorously and persuasively: Emmerich, Reinhard. “Bemerkungen zu Huang und Lao in der frühen Han-Zeit: Erkentnisse aus Shiji und Hanshu.” Monumenta Serica 43 (1995): 53-140. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the document now, but I haven't had a chance to look at it yet.FourLights (talk) 03:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]