Talk:Howard DGA-15

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Alot of the information is duplicated elsewhere. For example there is no need to talk about Mr Mulligan here as there is a Mr Mulligan section. Same with the DGA-11. Moving relevant text to right articles.--Abaddon 15:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point one: If you feel there is conflict of interest, so be it - but Howard owners do not need to "sell" their airplanes. Time after time, I have heard of the planes selling themselves!

Point two: It is useless to speak of any of the production Howards without pointing out their racing heritage; If you think eliminating verbage and replacing it with a lot of cross-references "improves" wikipedia, -- yeah, right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuance 4 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

conflict & duplication

Point one: If you feel there is conflict of interest, so be it - but Howard owners do not need to "sell" their airplanes. Time after time, I have heard of the planes selling themselves!

Point two: It is useless to speak of any of the production Howards without pointing out their racing heritage; If you think eliminating verbage and replacing it with a lot of cross-references "improves" wikipedia, -- yeah, right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuance 4 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

conflict resolution

I have tried to remove the hyperbolae and slanging matches from this article whilst stillretaining the pertinent bits. I believe the tags can be removed now, so I shall do that. If any body objects, open a discussion or revert it (re-instating the tags)Petebutt (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]