Talk:House of Saddam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the House of Saddam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

original air date

If BBC were airing it before anyone else, and started airing it on July the 10th, why is the original airdate for the first episode July 30 and why is the original airing in the info box listed as July 30? JayKeaton (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that was just an error from when I copied the table from somewhere. Sorted now, thanks. Bob talk 08:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image seems pointless being simply white text on a black background. I know their are copyright issues we must be aware of but could we not use something like this being part of the BBC press pack it should be to use. Or is it not that simple? RogMcDog (talk) 09:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's fairly standard to have a title screenshot for TV series infoboxes, i.e. Lost (TV series), 24 (TV series). I have to admit this one is quite dull, though. The article does need some more content at the moment, but I guess this will come once it has finished screening. The screenshot you have found would be most acceptable in addition for the plot section, perhaps when discussing the characters or the depiction of Saddam. Annoyingly, I lost a substantial addition I made the other day when that "database in lock" mode thing came up. Bob talk 13:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]