Talk:House of La Fayette

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Formatting

Also, there's some bad template formatting above the La Fayette Family Tree. I don't know anything about that template so I can't fix it myself, but someone should clean it up. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 17:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Pohick2 is working on the family tree right now. So, let it be for a while. Frania W. (talk) 19:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, help, how did that template problem get in there? i was editing an example of julio-claudian family tree. the picture does clarify all that verbiage. is this worthy of a separate article? say de La Fayette Family tree pohick (talk) 13:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pohick: The whole descendant paragraph could be worthy of a separate article. However, before deciding, you first must get help with this template, but it will not be from poor little old me totally ignorant in wiki template manipulation. Bonne chance! Frania W. (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, like the ball of string, i kept finding more web references to de La Fayette genealogy, and havn't read the French reference book yet, (funny, my genealogy is all in the musty archives, far from public view) i'm afraid i know just enough about templates to be dangerous, witness the red links i don't know how to edit out.

Btw, Lazu mentioned you were doing something about French noble articles? i commented elsewhere, that they seem less well developed than the English, for example List of French marquisates compared with Peerage of the United Kingdom. is there a group trying to put in "heraldica" into wiki? it would make a nice to do list at Wikipedia:WikiProject France pohick (talk) 19:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pohick: No, I am not working on any "List of French whatever" or doing any "heraldica". All I do here is read, edit & follow up on articles that are of interest to me, usually on people & events connected to the history of France. One leads to another & the ball starts rolling. Besides, I have a non-wiki profession & do this wiki thing simply for leisure, in order to relax. Voilà! Frania W. (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, (oh found the error message) "Any instance of |}} will cause a redlink at the top of the chart such as Template:Chart/cellb." now if i could just find the errors (this is worse than fortran) pohick (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pohick: I clicked on *edit page* in order to get LF family tree & checked every sign but could not see "any instance of |}}". We may have to go out & find help ! Ne vous découragez pas! Frania W. (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For some template stuff I might be able to help, but I've never worked with this particular template before and I can't really tell what the problem is. If you can narrow the problem down to one specific thing I might be able to look into it. Otherwise, I bet someone at WP:VP/T can figure it out. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 04:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank-you Gadget850, for the code fix! pohick (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have copyedited the tree, removing links which I believe add little or no value, for example, where it is not a surname but a commune, link to fr.wp article when it's already linked to en.wp. I have also removed some dates of birth and death for those names which already have links/articles. Having looked at some other family trees, I would say the vast majority of them, if not all, have only years of birth and death. However, I have so far not removed all dates for fear of losing information which could be of use at a later date.

Due to the length of names, perhaps we should move to a smaller font? Ohconfucius (talk) 07:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sub-article

Pohick: I believe that once the family tree is done (and formatted properly!), the section should be made into a sub-article to both Gilbert & Adrienne articles, with title that would mention both monsieur & madame, as her descendants are also his. Frania W. (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maison de Noailles maybe a Noailles family tree is in order pohick (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on House of La Fayette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on House of La Fayette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]