Talk:Hot as Sun

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles

This Beatles-related redirect is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Title

Should the page be renamed "Hot as Sun/Glasses"? cause that is the full title.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 18:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's a good question. According to web sources I've seen, McCartney considered them two different songs. For that reason, I'd probably leave it as is. Are there other sources that discuss the song(s)? — John Cardinal (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this story was misrepresented by Rolling Stone as a factual event. I read it when it was published and I do not recall any disclaimer that it was a fictional short story. There was a lot of buzz about the Beatles at the time and I think Rolling Stone may be trying to cover up the fact that they published something inaccurate and were possibly misled by the author. There were a lot of fictional articles sold to the media or publishers around that time which led to legendary lawsuits.

75.246.54.37 (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Jim Adams[reply]