Talk:Horsham Museum

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guidebook?

The article is more like a guidebook to the museum than an encyclopedic entry. My concerns are:

Excessive detail which when it is referenced mainly relies on primary sources.
One (or two) major contributors who may have a conflict of interest, maybe they could state any COI they may have?
Some of the text addresses readers directly in an unencyclopedic tone.

It would be good to get some feedback from other editors before I make any major changes. Having said all this I believe with a bit of colabiration this could be a very good article. Grim²³ ★ 14:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with all the above--I tagged this for coi and detail some few days ago. A major rewrite and pruning of non-essential and inadequately sourced information would be most constructive. 99.168.81.164 (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Horsham Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]