Talk:Horse Show Fountain

A fact from Horse Show Fountain appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1909-built Wright-Bock Fountain, (pictured) attributed to both Frank Lloyd Wright and Richard Bock, was completely replaced with a replica in 1969?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/June.

Wikipedia

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

Anyone know of a good infobox to use? Should I just use the building one? Is there a fountain infobox? IvoShandor 08:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear phrasing

"During the reconstruction, the original inscription on the reconstruction dedication panel was lost to history." What does this mean? The dedication panel that was used for the 1969 reconstruction had some earlier, unrelated, inscription on it which was erased so that the panel could be reused? The original fountain's 1909 fountain's dedication panel was lost, and no one remembers what it said? Or what? - Brian Kendig 21:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to clear this up, have a look, let me know. Basically the old insciption that appeared where the reconstruction-dedication inscription does today was lost. IvoShandor 21:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be accurate to say: "The inscription on the original fountain was lost to history."? Or was an inscription from the reproduction lost somehow, and if so, how? - Brian Kendig 03:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horse Show Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]