Talk:Hoover Building

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

coordinates link

If any wikipolice don't like my link (it works fine in firefox), here is a more conventional (but NOT as good) one. Copy and paste as appropriate:

<span id="coordinates" class="plainlinksneverexpand"> [[Geographic coordinate system|Coordinates]]: {{coor d|51.53357|N|0.319265|W}}</span>
jonathan riley 03:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of life and death. ;-) -- 217.171.129.69 (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Regeneration"?

I take issue with the heading "Tesco regeneration". Other than Tesco, I doubt that anyone would characterize what they did to the factory as "regeneration" (more apt words might include "bastardization" or "defacement"). Anyone have a term that's more appropriate? If not, I'll see what I can come up with. Bricology (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoover Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141015022154/http://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/200622/historic_buildings/70/other_notable_buildings/5 to http://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/200622/historic_buildings/70/other_notable_buildings/5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]