Talk:Hong Kong Logistic Support Regiment RLC

A fact from Hong Kong Logistic Support Regiment RLC appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 September 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Hong Kong Logistic Support Regiment RLC was nicknamed the "1000-Day Regiment" as its 1,181 days of service made it possibly the shortest-lived peacetime regiment in the British Army?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hong Kong Logistic Support Regiment RLC.

Wikipedia

Military history: British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

British Overseas Territories

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,488) • Stub-Class articles (6,676)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (386) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Hong Kong Logistic Support Regiment RLC was nicknamed the "1000-Day Regiment" as its 1,181 days of service made it possibly the shortest lived peacetime regiment in the British Army? Source: SCMP

Reviewed: Battle of Sedalia

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 08:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

all mostly looks good with this. It's new enough, just long enough (although at 1543 characters, it's extremely tight and it would certainly be useful to expand it a bit further with more detail). No obvious copyvios, and referencing is sound. The hook fact checks out. It also doesn't look directly related to British politics or the areas that the nominator was recently topic banned from for DYK, so no probs there IMHO. My one issue is with the use (in the article but not in the hook) of the term "believed to be". This is mentioned at WP:WEASEL as something to avoid, unless it is clarified who believes. It might be better to just use some variant of "probably", as the hook and the source do, if that can be achieved without too much close paraphrasing. Once that's sorted, should be good to go. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- @Amakuru: Just amended it as requested. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  Great, thanks. Can you do the one in the lead as well? — Amakuru (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Amakuru: Done. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good to go now. Thanks. I had a quick scour around for more information on this to expand a bit, and couldn't find very much. But there seems to be enough sourcing for WP:GNG in any case and there probably would be more in offline sourcing if one could get hold of it! Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 11:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]