Talk:Holy Water (Madonna song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 16:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article on the next couple of days. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

How do you know when was recorded?
- The second para of Background section. The song already leaked in December 2014. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Lead

martial beats → "martial beats"

Background

Natalia Kills picture shouldn't disrupt the following section.
- Does not matter if its in right alignment, anyways I added the {{clear}} template.
revolutionoflove"." → #revolutionoflove".
funny." → same as previous
and co-produced three of the songs on the record, including "Holy Water". → and ended up by co-producing three songs on the record, including "Holy Water".
However, → A week later,
including the demo version of "Holy Water" → among those it was "Holy Water"
- There is something wrong with the suggestion above. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant "them". You already corrected, great work. Done

Composition and lyrical interpretation

martial beats → "martial beats"
her own song "Vogue" during the song's bridge → her own song "Vogue" during the track's bridge
rank sexuality." → rank sexuality".
and genuflect." → same as previous
"Yeezus loves my pussy best." → same as previous
own sexuality." → same as previous
spiritual imagery." → same as previous

Done

Critical reception

Link music critics
In the first paragraph I see a pattern is always "some author OF some magazine", use variations, like "Time Out's Nick Levine", "The Daily Telegraph reviewer Andy Gill", "Saeed Saeed, while reviewing Rebel Heart, for the newspaper The National" so on...
Once again, the issue with the quotes and the full stop. Please correct them all.
- This has been corrected all. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"a welcome bit of percolating electronica, and she deserves props for effortlessly deploying the word 'genuflect' in a pop song, but Madonna's Catholic baiting feels like a reflex at this point. Despite her well-documented reputation, you could count her sexually provocative songs on one hand up to this point, so the fact that she nearly doubles that number here in one fell swoop suggests she's either consciously taking the piss out of her Dita Parlo persona or making some kind of comment about women of a certain age unapologetically flexing their libidos" → you should reduce the length of this reviews and use your own words in between.
No reviews of the song as a track only?

Live performance

"Holy Water"...as part of the first segment. → source?
- source. describes what's happening in the opening segment
priests." → same as previous
- source and its present
the cross." → as previous
- Again done.
his Apostles." → find the issue here
You have these type of issues in the all section. Please correct them all.
- I don't see any other issue. Please note I did not create this article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant is that this issue "priest." happens all the time in the entire article → "priest".

Oh thank you, my eyes must have been playing me because I thought I changed it already? Sorry. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Holy Water' → "Holy Water"

I changed the ones missing.

Done

Credits and personnel

All the management in a sentence is confusing, please divide it.
Link PT editing.

Done

References

Link Idolator.
Unlink Rolling Stone on reference 29.
Link Chicago Tribune
Link The Daily Telegraph on ref.23 and unlink The Daily Telegraph on ref 28
- U meant 39 i presume? Anyways all done/. :)

Yes that's what I meant, thank you.

Done

External links

Fine.

Overall GA review

@MarioSoulTruthFan: all addressed. So please see and let me know if I missed. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @IndianBio: I was not done with the review. Today I will finish it.
  - @MarioSoulTruthFan: is there anything pending with the article? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - @IndianBio: check the "Critical reception" and the "lead"
      - @MarioSoulTruthFan: Hi I have addressed both of them, and you were right that sentence was unnecessarily long and windy. As for track reviews, The Quietus and The National already has a track review and its included. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: fantastic work. Passing.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.