Jump to content

Talk:Holy Ground (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Holy Ground (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tkbrett (talk · contribs) 18:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Review to come. Tkbrett (✉) 18:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Swift wrote "Holy Ground" and came into the studio with producer Jeff Bhasker one day ... This part of the sentence is strange to me. Does it mean she wrote the song and introduced it to Bhasker in the course of a single day? If not, it ought to be reworded or maybe just omitted.
  • Reflecting on the incident, Swift thought to herself, ... "Swift thought to herself" is strange since I'm not sure how we would know that. Just cutting it to Reflecting on the incident, Swift expressed: ... is clearer.
  • Avoid using "noted" in two places (MOS:SAID).
  • By MOS:BODY, I'd consider merging the Commercial performance into another section since its only three sentences. Maybe Production and release or Critical reception.
  • Copyvio is a good 13.8%. No copyright issues.
  • Image checks out as CC.

Apologies this review took so long to get to Ippantekina. Anyway, as you can see above I don't have many issues. I'm glad I picked it up though because I probably never would've heard this song – I think Perone is right that its worth a listen for the casual listeners like myself. Tkbrett (✉) 19:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks so much for taking up this review. I’m glad you gave this song a listen; it was one of the tracks that convinced me to take Swift’s music seriously. I’m currently on a trip so please allow me some delay in finishing the nom. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ippantekina, I made you wait long enough for the review, so please take all the time you need. Enjoy your trip. Tkbrett (✉) 16:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Tkbrett:, I believe all issues are addressed now. Let me know if the article needs more work. Thank you very much for your patience! Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good Ippantekina.  Pass Tkbrett (✉) 02:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk17:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the beats in Taylor Swift's song "Holy Ground" were described by Brad Nelson of The Atlantic as being "insistent enough to act as punctuation for the lyrics"? Source: Nelson, Brad (November 1, 2012). "If You Listen Closely, Taylor Swift Is Kind of Like Leonard Cohen". The Atlantic.
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: QPQ not needed: this is my second DYK nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Nominated by Unlimitedlead at 14:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Unlimitedlead: Great article. Hook is interesting and cited, article is copyvio free, and it's new enough. I approve this nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]