This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot05:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I propose to merge Lasky-DeMille Barn into Hollywood Heritage Museum. I think that the content in the Lasky-DeMille Barn article can easily be explained in the context of the museum (as its largest artifact), and the two articles are both of reasonable size such that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Merger would reduce duplication of content and provide a clearer, simpler-to-digest presentation for readers. Both articles were created in 2004 by User:FredR, who apparently anticipated that separate articles for organization vs. building would be appropriate. Since then, there has been much more development of "combo" articles about organizations and their places, e.g. to cover in one article an ongoing or historical church organization and the building(s) it has occupied, and similarly for many historic sites and corresponding entities. --Doncram (talk) 20:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]