Talk:Hodgdon Powder Company

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hodgdon Powder Company article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Hodgdon Reloading Data Manual #19" states that in "Tulsa Sept 19, 1964 Hodgdon Powders Swept 11th National benchrest Matches - take first 3 places-"

The first page claims that the company was founded in 1966 and that is started in 1952. I can infer that the 1966 figure is wrong.Clarkmag (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Black Powder

The comment about black powder needs to be removed. The powders you are referring to here are NOT black powders. It wouldn't surprise me that Hodgdon's powder would win the benchrest matches. I had a 7 mm Remingon Magnum with a good scope and sighted in to go up through the line of sight at about 80 meters and come back down across the line of sight at about 350 meters using Hodgdon's 4831 war surplus powder and Sierra 168 grain hollow point boat-tail bullets. The recoil was much less severe than the IMR powders and the accuracy much better. The newer 4831 wasn't as good but was much better than the IMR powders. I could put about 5 shots in a spread covered by a dime at 100 meters. Distances of one kilometer pose no problems as long as the temperatures aren't too high or the air too thick. If those conditions prevail, which of the bulls-eyes are real? That isn't my major comment. What does black powder have to do with ANY of the IMR or Hodgdon's tubular smokeless powders? They are NOT black powder. Modern smokeless powders are much safer than older black powder. That comment about black powder needs to be removed. What powder do the 50 caliber military sniper rifles use? The IMR powders from Dupont the last I heard. The recoil of the IMR is much more severe than Hodgdon's. I used only Winchester brass and preferred the normal CCI primers over the magnum primers because I got better accuracy. hhhobbit (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to clarify the issue of black powder vs Hodgdon's modern substitute formulation.Thewellman (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information by a new user with potential conflict of interest

User:HPC1947, stating they are an employee of subject company, has recently substituted unsourced information for deleted information with sources. In the absence of objections, I propose to restore the deleted information and delete information without citations from WP:Reliable sources. Thewellman (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, after waiting a month for source citations. Thewellman (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]