Talk:History of women in linguistics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 June 2024 by reviewer Ca (talk · contribs).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes I made to the draft

@Fleur Dierickx Can you explain the reasoning behind your revert of my edits? There was no explanation provided so I remain confused. The Tone content tag was because of paragraphs like this Meanwhile, those female linguistic contributions that have not fully slipped into obscurity should be regarded separately from a more general history of linguistics, so as not to measure their significance against male achievements, where it presents opinions as fact and provide instructions, as if this is an academic essay.

WP:Short description helps readers navigate pages by showing a short description of it in the search bar. In this case, the title is descriptive enough that I simply put none, but the template itself is still required. The page is no longer an orphan so you were correct to remove that tag. "Introduction" section header are not a typical part of a Wikipedia article. See MOS:LEADELEMENTS Ca ^{talk to me!} 22:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Response

@Ca Thank you for your message. I created this page for a university assignment, which requires me to submit a version that has not been edited by other users. I agree with and appreciate your comments and edits and will incorporate them back into the page as soon as possible.

@Fleur Dierickx, you can submit a WP:PERMALINK of the page, so that it links to a specific revision only. Please do not revert further as it could be construed as WP:edit warring. 👍