Talk:History of email spam

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Misleading article

Why does this article exist? It only goes back to 2004. This is spam that doesn't deliver what it says on the can. Let's bin it. APW (talk) 09:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about deleting this. I came here expecting to find a story about the law firm who sent out a mass mailing for green card services in the mid-90s and got the net in an uproar. Starting in 2004 is far too late. Dharris (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the second paragraph, it says "While the linguistic significance of the usage of the word 'spam' is attributed to the British comedy troupe Monty Python (who allegedly staged a skit in which a group of Vikings sing a chorus of "SPAM, SPAM, SPAM..." at increasing volumes and attempt to drown out other conversation), the historic significance lies in it being adopted to refer to unsolicited commercial electronic mail sent to a large number of addresses, in what was seen as drowning out normal communication on the Internet." "Allegedly" is used incorrectly. Monty Python quite clearly did do that skit. It is just not clear that junk email being called SPAM came from that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.215.177.188 (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree that it should be deleted. It's incoherent, hopelessly incomplete, lacking in historical context and factually dubious.

I wouldn't object to a new article with the same title. Just - this ain't that article. MrDemeanour (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Refurbishing...

Yup this article has been terrible for a long time. I'm now doing what I can to make some progress; feel free to assist! Snori (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of email spam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]