Jump to content

Talk:History of York City F.C. (1922–1980)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHistory of York City F.C. (1922–1980) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHistory of York City F.C. (1922–1980) is part of the York City F.C. series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 26, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 3, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 6, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 29, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 10, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
August 22, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
September 18, 2015Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
November 23, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Fair use rationale for Image:YorkCity60s70s.JPG

[edit]

Image:YorkCity60s70s.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing

[edit]

I'm having a go at copy editing today. I've downloaded the text to my word processor and I will put a revision back later on. Feel free to mess about with it more if you think I've got it wrong!!--Harkey Lodger 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done as much as I can. This article needs peer review again now.--Harkey Lodger 12:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review comments

[edit]

Here you go...

So, quite a lot to deal with. But knowing Matty, it won't be long before the comments are attended to so I'll put it on hold for now. Shout at me when you're ready for re-review or for clarification of the above. The Rambling Man 17:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if I can help at all.A lot of hard work has gone into this article and I would like to see it promoted.Good luck--Harkey Lodger 18:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You can certainly get involved if you wish! Mattythewhite 18:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1922–38

The club appointed Jock Collier as their player-manager in July 1928, becoming the first manager of the club. Still reads a bit odd.Maybe "In July 1928 Jack Collier was made the first player-manager of the club." would sound better? --Harkey Lodger 18:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review continues

[edit]

It's massively better than before, very close to GA in my opinion and shows good signs of being FA potential with some decent copyediting! As always, let me know.... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job. GA now. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of York City F.C. (1922–1980)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Copy-edit for WP:MOS e.g. dashes in years and seasons
  2. Standardise on use of dash or slash for season years

Keith D 14:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Copy-edit for jargon and football specific slang
  2. Repetitive final section could be edited to add interest
Harkey Lodger 18:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 18:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Is and not Are - Hurrah!

[edit]

Pleasantly surprised that the correct grammar has not been shot down by the usual suspects. WillE (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of York City F.C. (1908–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on History of York City F.C. (1908–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 41 external links on History of York City F.C. (1908–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]