Jump to content

Talk:History of Gmail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Gmail multiple.jpg

[edit]

Image:Gmail multiple.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Launch year?

[edit]

The very first sentence of the article references the April Fools' Day launch; however, it neglects to mention the year this occurred. This really should be corrected...

E-Garfield

[edit]

Doesn't seem to be working http://www.e-garfield.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcking (talk • contribs) 12:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the Garfield.com website and it looks like they're not offering the email service anymore. However, checking the www.gmail.com domain on The Wayback Machine shows some other company called USemail.net. Gmail takes over the domain by July 2000, according to the Wayback Machine, at least.--Valistar (talk) 03:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. The July 2000 redirect to Gmail page (I think) is being caused by a technical error. See the Wayback Machine results for 2001-2003; it shows some company called NetConcept's homepage consistently. I think this reference to 'an email service by Garfield' is vandalism.

Merge?

[edit]

Why is this it's own page? Shouldn't it be on the Gmail page. Utoks (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it, the page was split out of the History of Gmail section in the main Gmail article. Gmail is very long, so putting this back into the main page would be inadvisable. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 00:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FreeGmailBySearchingGoogle-small.png

[edit]

Image:FreeGmailBySearchingGoogle-small.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why so many "citation needed"?

[edit]

It looks like someone basically copy pasted a "citation needed" notice on nearly every section for no obvious reason. I mean, a couple perhaps need references, but others are, in my opinion, unquestionable. John Holly (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tags are there because there no reference cited and the statements have been challenged as to whether they are correct or not under Wikipedia policy. The tags can be replaced with cited references or eventually the unsupported statements and the tags will be deleted.- Ahunt (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When is this "eventually" supposed to happen? It has been nearly three years, and the article still looks like a mess. I may try to research some of these and add citations, but the others I'm simply going to remove, unless I see actual challenges to the claims. --Lewis (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The tags are the challenges to the claims, so if the tags are removed then the text should go as well as "not verifiable", see WP:V. It is far better that the encyclopedia have no information rather than uncited or wrong information. As Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales is quoted as saying "There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative "I heard it somewhere" pseudo information is to be tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced." So if the items cannot be sourced they should be removed. - Ahunt (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, since a week has passed without any further discussion and without any citations being found, I will go ahead and clean up the article, based on the age of the tags. Any of the statements can be put back in if refs are found. - Ahunt (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Here is a very useful article from a reliable source for the improvement of this article. How Gmail Happened: The Inside Story of Its Launch 10 Years Ago -120.59.41.123 (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also see that this article can be used to provide references to many of the unverified claims (that were later removed due to lack of refs as per WP:Verifiability) made in this 2011 version of this page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Gmail&oldid=464178119 -120.59.41.123 (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

--Gary Dee 10:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read these reports? You removed links to the Gmail official blog because it uses outdated SSL? Not to worry it was reverted by another editor. - Ahunt (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Gmail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Gmail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gmail & Garfield the Cat

[edit]

Gmail was orginally used by Garfield the Cat. Garfield got his start in Indiana. For the history of this visit:https://gizmodo.com/the-original-gmail-was-garfield-mail-1822970617 Srsurfin77 (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Gmail&oldid=1202731087"