This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
The Reception section notoriously glosses over the huge influence History and Class Consciousness has had upon all of Frankfrurt School's Critical Theory as early as with Dialectic of Enlightenment, and not just with Frankfurt's late renegade Habermas who did away with most of Adorno and Marcuse's Critical Theory, especially by abandoning Freud's influence upon Frankfurt's Freudo-Marxist concept of ideology, as such that Habermas prefers to speak of supposedly justified, reasonable interest rather than critizizable, rationalized-after-the-fact ideology (Habermas denounces Adorno and Habermas's fundamental warnings of ideology as supposedly utterly unjustified "skepticism towards reason"), believing that every problem on earth could be solved purely by reasonable verbal debate alone, rather than by political means and via social institutions or organizations. In other words, I wouldn't be surprised if Habermas said that we only need to talk Coronavirus out of infecting people, rather than relying upon institutions such as WHO and politicians from organized parties recommending or mandating social distancing. --2003:DA:CF4C:7500:352E:684:3B03:54E3 (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
