Talk:Historic center of Mexico City

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Historic sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Top‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move (April 14, 2014)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) ^walk victor falk^talk 02:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Historic center of Mexico City → Historic Center of Mexico City – Harmonize with the Spanish Wikipedia article title. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC) --Oglesruins (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - doesn't seem to be a proper noun. Red Slash 21:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per RedSlash; no idea why anybody would even think harmonizing with what some other wiki does should play any role here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Does Spanish use the same grammar rules that English does? No. So the underlying logic falls flat on it's face. Wikidata is the tool that manages these differences. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: En.WP is not es.WP. Even aside from language differences, our MOS is way more developed and nuanced than any other Wikipedia's. And English's handling of this stuff is much more complex than in Spanish, anyway. Plus it would be terribly ambiguous, even misleading, in English. A Center (Centre) capitalized in English means an institution of some kind (e.g. Center for Democracy and Technology). "Historic Center of Mexico City" would imply something completely different from this article, an organization that could be renamed the Center for Mexico City History. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 11:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move June 2104

Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México → Historic Center of Mexico City – Article titles should use English where a common English name exists! Please see WP:UE (someone moved the page away from the English title DESPITE the discussion above Keizers (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back. User:Correogsk, this is English-language encyclopedia and WP:UE is a policy. Please follow the WP:RM procedure in the future. No such user (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Calidum ^{Talk To Me} 03:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Historic center of Mexico City → Historic Center of Mexico City – Mmmm....I feel like I'm being picky, but "Historic Center of Mexico City" seems to be a proper noun (UNESCO being quite an authority I think, see here), and thus Center should be capitalized according to WP:NCCAPS. We also need to be consistent as there is differing capitalization for the "Historic Center/center/Centre/centre of Quito, Mexico City, Lima, Macau, Salvador, Florence, Trujillo, Morelia, Córdoba, etc. Perhaps we should go with the UNESCO usage considering them proper nouns and British spelling Keizers (talk) 03:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the article is about the place, not the UNESCO listing. For all the reasons we turned down this proposal in April, still no. Dicklyon (talk) 05:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historic center of Mexico City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090226201737/http://www.sanildefonso.org.mx/frame.php?sec=11 to http://www.sanildefonso.org.mx/frame.php?sec=11

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Historic center of Mexico City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barrio Chino within historic center?

Is Barrio Chino within the historic center? If I search "Historic center of Mexico City" via Google Maps, Barrio Chino is outside the boundaries provided by Google. Curious if folks more familiar with boundaries can weigh in here. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the definition of what is considered "Centro histórico", but as the postal direction is "Barrio Chino, Centro, 06000", it is part of it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google is NOT an authoritative source on neighborhood borders ANYWHERE, including my current city of Washington, D.C., and certainly not the definitions of colonias, such as Colonia Centro, whose boundaries are official boundaries of government administrative units, which are one level below that of the alcaldías, or boroughs. Here are the official boundaries; Centro's western border is Atenas street, and Barrio Chino is well within the borders of Colonia Centro. Google has huge mistakes for example, it calls this tiny area "Roma" when in fact it is officially a part of Roma Sur, and the Roma area - a gigantic place - does not exist as an official unit - it is split into Colonia Roma Norte and Colonia Roma Sur. Keizers (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New edit after EC

User:Tbhotch after EC for 2 days, is this edit fine with you? is that an okay version to avoid further disagreements and counter edits? Kaidros (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For me it was OK. As I said at ANI, an independent article can be created for the subject (Draft:Rickshaws in Mexico City). (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]