Talk:Historic Hotels of Europe

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because Historic Hotels of Europe is a brand that is very visible across Europe, and the organisation is clearly very important for not only the hotels themselves, but also for tourism on the continent and for Europa Nostra's mission. I'm aware that WP:OTHERSTUFF exists, but seriously, several of the national SUB(!)-organisations have their own wikipedia articles. Some of the links to these articles have been added in the table. --SSJ ^t 16:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately an AfD brought no further discussion. This article should have at least 1-2 references from independent reliable sources beyond brief mentions in catalogues. Simply being an umbrella organisation of notable members doesn't make the association notable itself. Lacking consensus in this unclear situation it's probably a keep for now. GermanJoe (talk) 11:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]