Talk:High king
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Isaiah Henry.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 23 December 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
High king → High King – Title. Per WP:CONSISTENCY with King of Kings, etc. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - If anything, it is King of Kings that needs moving per MOS:JOBTITLES. Primergrey (talk) 15:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This isn't a job title, it's a style of address. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- The same as "king", "queen", "lord", "madam", etc. Unless part of a specific title, all these forms of address are lower-case. Primergrey (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per the argument of Randy Kryn. Dimadick (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – I don't understand the support argument. Since when do we cap "a style of address"? Dicklyon (talk) 04:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. The current title is the correct one. It's the other article that should be moved. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.