Talk:High Speed Civil Transport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the High Speed Civil Transport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Current Project?

I'm sort of concerned that there's no cited evidence for this being a current project, but the article is written in the present tense.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 03:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Others have expressed the same concerns on WT:AIR. You're welcome to clean it up if you get to it first. You may have a better idea of where to go with the page too, given your contributions to Concorde (Look, Ma, no "the"!) and other high-speed propulsion-related articles. - BillCJ (talk) 04:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

concorde nomenclature

FWIW I have not got the slightest intention of enforcing it either way in anything other than UK articles, but I note that there is precedent for referring to (a/the) Concorde with the British convention as simply 'Concorde'.[1] :-)- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 11:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of aspects of HSCT/HSR not mentioned in the article but important to note were that the project also addressed the environmental issues that the Concorde and TU-144 did not - namely engine noise, Concorde made a hell of racket taking off compared to subsonic airliners (TU-144 did too, but in the Soviet Union noise complaints by the general population probably weren't a big concern), and emissions. Fortunately Concorde was a bust financially so there were only a handful built, but flying up there in the stratosphere, NOx emitted from gas turbine engines participate in autocatalytic reactions to deplete our friend the ozone layer. HSCT/HSR engineers (including this one) worked long and hard to reduce NOx emissions to acceptable levels (as defined by independent climatologists). This was important since the U.S. envisioned a successful project involving 100s of SSTs. Jmdeur (talk) 20:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on High Speed Civil Transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080102134859/http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT1998/2000/2300shaw.html to http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT1998/2000/2300shaw.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]