Talk:High-explosive incendiary

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Comments

Duplicate information, please fix it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.24.200 (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The interwiki links are all wrong. I tried to fix it, but some stupid bot keeps reverting them. /83.227.130.26 (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 14:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

High explosive incendiary → High-explosive incendiary – Hyphenation of a compound modifier. Other articles are so hyphenated, such as High-explosive squash head and High-explosive anti-tank warhead. Chris the speller ^yack 02:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~: I don't think this is necessary at all. High is an adjective of explosive in this case and therefore should (and maybe even can) not be separated with a hyphen. TheJack15 (talk) 05:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking confirmed sock. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support clarifying hyphenation. Some books are generous enough to help their readers that way. Dicklyon (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:HYPHEN as a compound modifier. kennethaw88 • talk 22:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.