Talk:Hieracium

As weed

The "Plant pest" section just mentions New Zealand, but at least some species are considered weeds in a lot of other places (Australia and the United States seemed to come up in a few searches, but I didn't try to find everywhere this might be true). I think in the US, some noxious weed or other legal definitions have failed to adequately distinguish between the non-native weeds and native endemic species (if I understand the story right, the latter were not significant problems in pastures or other such places), although I can't find a reference for that now. If anyone knows more about this, or where to look, improving this section would be very helpful. Kingdon (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Common names translation

I've removed the transwiki tag from the "Common names" section as there's no need to transwiki the entire article over to Wiktionary, which is what that template asks for. If the translations will be of use at en.wikt, then they can be copied over manually. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orange hawkweed European native

I see my edit of the list of European varieties of hawkweed - to add orange hawkweed - has been reverted. I have it growing in my garden in the UK and the Wikipedia entry on Pilosella aurantiaca (aka Hieracium aurantiacum) says "native to alpine regions of central and southern Europe". In what way is this plant not European (as well as growing in the US)?Richwil (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that Pilosella aurantiaca is no longer included in Hieracium. It is very definitely a European species.Plantsurfer 10:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. This is a good example of how English names can be misleading. Not all plants called "hawkweeds" are now placed in the genus Hieracium. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hieracium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hieracium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]