Jump to content

Talk:Hidden headlamp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Citation

[edit]

Cars with no existing wikipedia page should be cited. I will attempt to cite as many as possible. Uncited vehicles that cannot be verified will be removed from the list. Bergallanj (talk) 09:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I Googled around but couldn't find a comprehensive list of cars with hidden headlights, so I will add them (along with the years the car came with hidden headlights) one by one as I find specific info. Dan 16:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an interesting idea--I feel pretty sure there is no such list currently. But that may be because it's impossible to produce one. We would need people with expertise on every worldwide marque and model since at least the 1930's! Is even Wiki up to a challenge like that? I guess we'll see. For the present, I think I'll title the list "Partial," and add in what data I can. It will be interesting to see how, or if, it develops. RivGuySC 04:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite a few additions and a lot more American cars than I could think of. I think it's very possible to make this a definitive list, given time and some feedback from car guys in Europe especially to find the makes and models not sold in the US. Glad to see another fan of the blown 3800 on here! Dan 14:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the DeSoto illustration! One of the best of that car I've ever seen. Oh, yeah, Dan--if it ain't valve-in-head, it ain't Buick, and if it ain't blown, it blows! RivGuySC 02:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidentally, an ultra-rare '69 Caprice with hidden lights has come up on e-bay, if anybody wants to have a look: item# 4621538057, ending on March 19. RivGuySC 06:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're rather pointless in countries (such as Scandinavia) where lights have to be on all the time (as they won't be retracted anyway when the car is moving), so it appears funny that even Volvo installed them at some point ..... --84.115.129.76 21:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavia is not a country. And, the law in Sweden, Norway and other Scandinavian countries does not necessarily require the headlamps to be on all the time. See Daytime running lamp. --Scheinwerfermann 21:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Toyota Corolla and Sprinter Trueno are basically the same car sold in different locations under different names. Do they both need to be listed? --Ae86 09:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Anyone ever gone on http://www.carstyling.ru/ ? They have a very comprehensive list of automobiles that fit this category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.88.178.126 (talk) 02:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mangled text

[edit]

The text:

While the arrangement was again popular in the 1970s, particularly for US specification models, one part is the U.S. DOT regulation in 1968, concerning headlight heights. Many manufacturers saw this to get around laws to allow their cars to be imported without making expensive redesign work. Also in large part because the retracted headlamps had less aerodynamic drag, it has fallen out of favour,

is badly mangled, and has been since the first edit of this article. "one part is the DOT regulation" makes no sense. What did the manufacturers see as a way to get their cars imported? And how could reduced drag make hidden headlamps fall out of favour? I can't make out what is intended here, but if any of you have a clue, maybe you can fix it. --Slashme 08:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're right, that was a real mess. I've cleaned it up. --Scheinwerfermann 16:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Desoto1943promart.jpg

[edit]

Image:Desoto1943promart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aerodynamic Headlamps

[edit]

What are aerodynamic headlamps? - Rderijcke (talk) 00:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see headlamp and aerodynamics. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 00:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know what both terms mean, but hoe could they not be permitted by US laws? If an aerodynamic headlamp is really just a headlamp sunken in the body of the car, then what does "in the US market where aerodynamic headlamps were not permitted" mean? There are lots of cars from the late sixties and earlier with headlamps that follow the grid of the car. Actually, about every car I know has aerodynamic headlamps. So I probably don't understand what aerodynamic headlamps exactly are. Is here anyone who can explain it to me? - Rderijcke (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As it says in Headlamp, from 1940 to 1983 all vehicles in the U.S. were required to come equipped with sealed-beam headlamps, in one of only four standardised shapes and sizes (large or small, round or rectangular). Model-specific headlamps with lenses contoured along with the body lines were not permitted, nor (after 1967) were aerodynamic cover lenses over the sealed beams permitted. The only (partially) aerodynamic kind of headlamps permitted during that period in the U.S. was hidden headlamps, which are aerodynamic only when the lamps are not in use. See also FMVSS 108. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hidden headlamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Is the inclusion of the gallery really of importance in this article? Bergallanj (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hidden_headlamp&oldid=1202702307"