Talk:Hestercombe House

Hestercombe House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 30, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 14, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 7, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that a Junkers Ju88 was shot down and crashed on the drive of historic Hestercombe House on 28 March 1944?

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I think there is an chronological problem in the gardens section, it is stated "The gardens were laid out by Gertrude Jekyll and Edwin Lutyens for Coplestone Warre Bamfylde" - as Coplestone Warre Bamfylde, died 1791, I don't see how Lutyens and Jeckyl could have designed the gardend for him. Giano 16:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This si taken from the English Heritage listing of the gardens at Images of England entry for Garden walls, paving and steps on the South front of Hestercombe House, but I will reword to overcome this.— Rod ^talk 17:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the layout in 1904-06 was for the Hon EWB Portman. — Rod ^talk 20:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that the planted plat at Hestercombe— in the form of a square with a saltire criss-cross, I remember— was replanted in the 1970s (?) according to a surviving Gertrude Jekyll planting plan— by the Somerset Volunteer Fire Brigade!— a memorable and enviable mark of the general level of culture in the UK, I thought as an American. I was introduced there to Bergenia, which a gardener of Miss Jekyll's generation, perhaps Elwes, dubbed "pigsqueak". --Wetman 07:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GA

This article has failed its GA because of criteria two, references. I feel that this article needs way more references on a lot of the statements, in all of the sections (including the intro). With the references included I think that this article will do nicely. Dooms Day349 00:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What else is needed to get this article to GA?

What else do people think would be needed to get this article to meet the Good article criteria?— Rod ^talk 18:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hestercombe House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll do the usual - make straightforward copyedits as I go and jot notes below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this ref mentions the fire brigade leasing it in 1953 and it falling into disrepair around this time - helps with chronology and should be added.

~~Para 3 of House section has no references.~~

Last sentence of that section looks lonely all by itself - can it be put onto a para or expanded?

Gardens section has several small paras that could be joined I think.

~~First sentence of para 3 in lead shouldn't start with "It.."~~

~~I get the impression the article needs a bit more filling out material-wise - it just comes across as a bit brief but I can't put my finger on what's missing....~~

More later.

I've had a go at some of the suggestions above and will await more. There is more on the garden in the German wikipedia, but I've looked at it (with google translate) and can't really see which other details should be included.— Rod ^talk 19:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right - that is interesting. ~~This article needs a location like in the German one.~~

garden section needs expanding - info on Dutch Garden for starters - and some on key plant species used. Some of the German article veers a little too much into general info about Jekyll/Luytens but not much.

I've had a go - can you take another look and see if you think I have included enough?— Rod ^talk 09:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's looking better...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Describing Penelope Hobhouse as a "garden writer, designer, lecturer and television presenter" seems a bit effusive - can't we just use 1-2 descriptors?~~

I took that from our article about her - shortened to "garden writer and designer".— Rod ^talk 14:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah better. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just left a couple of ^{[citation needed]} tags - one would be good for the view but I suspect that may be hard...yet is obvious?

I've added some more (including one for the view).— Rod ^talk 08:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hestercombe House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hestercombe House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hestercombe House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]