Talk:Herbert Baxter Adams Prize

Regarding "Notability"

Title supllied above by: Ludvikus (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I note that almost by definition a prize for a "first book" will not be useful to establish notability, unless other works follow., DGG (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

What's the point, or relevance of your "note" here? Ludvikus (talk) 00:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I think this is in regards to the number of red links in the list of recipients. It is a fair point and it is one I had considered while reformatting the list. My thought was that the winning of an international level award would go a lot towards a person's notability, but I could be wrong of course! Ashanda (talk)

Requested move

Herbert Baxter Adams prize → Herbert Baxter Adams Prize — The official name of the prize has the word "Prize" (with "P/p" capitalized) —Ludvikus (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support.

This is clearly an uncontroversial move: there is no such thing as the "Herbert Baxter Adams" prize.

The full name of the prize is: "Herbert Baxter Adams Prize."

--Ludvikus (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

---

• You didn't have to do this. If you hadn't commented out the speedy deletion template that I set up on the redirect, it would have been done. Ashanda (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

• By "you" you must mean me. I did not notice any Speedy Deletion! --Ludvikus (talk) 03:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Anyway, what you're saying implies there's no controversy, right? --Ludvikus (talk) 03:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Move completed. This is noncontroversial. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)