Talk:Heraclonas/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Heraclius is overlinked.
- Done
- The Emperor Heraclius died in February 641 from edema --> "The emperor Heraclius died in February 641 from edema"
- Done
- His reign is usually dated from April/May – September/October 641 What do you mean usually? Did some sources say another data?
- Done
- leaving the empire jointly to his eldest son The Empire.
- Done
- Constantine III, and Heraklonas,[7][5][8] Re-order the refs.
- Done
- I see four howevers which is a lot for a short article like this one.
- Done
- I see some DD/MM/YYYY and MM/DD/YYYY as usage maybe standardise them.
- Done
- under the regency of Martina.[11][12][8] Capitalise "under" because it is the start of a sentence and re-order the refs here.
- Done
- believed that Heraklonas died in 642.[15][12][5] Re-orde the refs.
- Done
- towns of Egypt, but was unable to cross the Nile Unlink the Nile because it's a common term.
- Done
- power to Constantine. Heraclius' will was objectionable to much Little bit wordy here. especially with thd "will was" part.
- Done
- he was informed by his financial minister --> "he was informed by his finance minister"
- Done
- No edit war.
Infobox
- "February–April/May 641 (Co-emperor)" Just a suggestion but maybe you should put "(Co-emperor)" below the reign. This'd look a lot better.
- Done
- "Constantine III (February–April/May 641)" Same as above.
- The template of the infobox prevents me from messing with the order of this. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- "641 (aged 15)" --> "641 (aged 14–15)" Because we do not know when he was born.
- The Moore source tells us he is 15. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- "Flavius Constantinus Heraclius (Heraclianus)" Augustus isn't there in the full name or wasn't that part of his full name?
- I've removed it from his lede full name as it was part of his regnal name. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Sources
- Some ISBNs have hyphens others don't, maybe standardise the ISBNs
- Done
- Add "Vol 2" in the Bellinger and Grierson's source.
- Done
- There is an error in the book of "Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit Online. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften" and could you please translate the books's title too?
- Template doesn't allow a translation, but I have added the title. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- The Bibliography claims that the book of Moore was published in 1996 but both Google Books and archive.org claim it was from 1969, which one is correct?
- The Moore source isn't a book, and the project wasn't started until 1996? Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- "Justinian II, Leontius and Tiberius 685-711" --> "Byzantium in the Seventh Century: Justinian II, Leontius and Tiberius 685-711"
- Done
- No OR.
Images
- Image looks good to me.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5: Believe I have done all you ask. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5: Repinging. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Iazyges: I was wondering why the Staurakios's article has a separete part called co-emporor but here we do not have that? I'm not sure why this is so. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'll pass it believe it is ready to be a GA. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- @CPA-5: Repinging. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)