Talk:Hepatic hydrothorax/GA2
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Aeschylus (talk · contribs) 18:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 10:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I should finish the review today. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- It is much more common on the right side, with 85% of cases occurring on the right redundancy
- Link severe ascites on fist occurrence
- In cases that do not respond What does "cases" mean here?
- The prognosis is usually poor. Needs further explanation
- In some people, the main symptoms of people with cirrhosis are respiratory and related to the effusion. Unsourced
- The condition generally has no specific symptoms comma after symptoms
- The condition generally has no specific symptoms as it generally occurs Redundancy
- I notice the articles is underlinked. Please fix that
- less than 1 cm Add a cvt template
- I don't see anything on its causes
- For those with refractory hepatic hydrothorax Change those to patients
- In people with serious liver dysfunction, TIPS may cause liver failure, as it shunts blood away from the liver. Unsourced
- Please change for those to for patients throughout the article
- Sources are reliable
- File:Hepatic hydrothorax after treatment.png lacks an author
@Aeschylus: That's all from me. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 11:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good! I will work on it promptly.
1. Done
2: Done
3: Done
4: Done
5: Done
6: Done
7: Done
8: Done
9: Done
10: Done
11: Partly done: I changed to people, as we need to write for the layperson per MEDMOS
12: Done
13: Not done for now Doesn't this violate MEDMOS?
15: Done aeschylus (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Driveby comment.
Article on medical conditions should strive to use the most up-to-date appropriate sources, per WP:MEDDATE. There's a recent open access review at PMID 38505059 that perhaps could be used in this article. Esculenta (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aeschylus: You might want to consider this. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 19:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am, my activity is on-and-off. I will do so rn. aeschylus (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aeschylus: Let me know if you're done, because it seems like you aren't even addressing some of the issues I've raised. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 07:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: AFAIK, I have addressed all of your concerns. However, I may have missed some. If I have, don't hesitate to let me know. aeschylus (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aeschylus: Let me know if you're done, because it seems like you aren't even addressing some of the issues I've raised. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 07:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. aeschylus (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)