Talk:Henry Wickham (explorer)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV

[1] says that "The evildoer was an English botanist named Alexander Wickham. Tradition has it that this British gent smuggled some 70,000 seeds of hevea brasiliensis out of the country saying they were for Queen Victoria's Kew Gardens in England, and soon plantations in the British colonies in South-East Asia where producing rubber more cheaply than Brazil."

Which is correct?--203.45.119.219 04:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The area Sir Henry Wickman collect the seeds, was near Vila Boim at the left bank of Tapajós River, few miles from the city of Santarém in Satate of Pará, not Manaus area

That someone can be a 'biopirate' when there is no law against it is a contradiction in terms. The expression is an empty bit of rhetoric. Brazil is a great country that consumes maize and chocolate amongst other things. The seeds for those originated in Mexico. Does that make Brazilians 'biopirates'? Of course not. 109.157.23.220 (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talking of the Rule of Law in most of 19th Century Latin America is an anachronism: the place was a wild west. However, that does not mean that there was no policy, if only that of the rubber bosses who had banned the export of rubber trees, seedlings and seeds to preserve their effective monopoly, which had become expensive after Goodyear's discovery of vulcanisation in the early 1840s. This led the British Government to break the monopoly as described: that all parties agree means that this article is at best contentious, which becomes a breach of NPOV when one considers the use of non-neutral terminology such as "pirate" and "self-aggrandising", and the general rhetorical tone. The case must either be proven or separated from historical fact into a distinct section. As I know insufficient of the authorities to present a balanced point of view, I am unwilling to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.138.254 (talk) 06:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Wickham (explorer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050121100245/http://irrdb.com/irrdb/NaturalRubber/History/HenryWickham.htm to http://www.irrdb.com/IRRDB/NaturalRubber/History/HenryWickham.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]