Talk:Henry Norris (courtier)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lady Frideswide Lovell was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Henry Norris (courtier). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Anne Boleyn#The fall of Anne Boleyn|plot to get rid of Anne]] The anchor (#The fall of Anne Boleyn) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Anne Boleyn#The fall of Anne Boleyn|Anne Boleyn]] The anchor (#The fall of Anne Boleyn) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Please explain what the copyright violation is. There is no copying word for word from the Berkshire History website the facts given there have been completely rewoven into a new presentation and combined with data from the other sources quoted.

If this use is this is judged to be a copyright violation please be more specific, and I would be happy to edited it to an acceptible form, since I argue the article has merit for WP and has certainly not been copied from this source.

In any case the ultimate source of The Berkshire History website page is an out of copyright version of the DNB which I am prepared to directly extract material from and reference it if necessary. The Berkshire History website merely provides a more convenient location for everyone to check some facts.

Op. Deo 18:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well you seemd to extract lots of data from the page you mentioned above. Almost seems like copy/paste with some formating of text. Berkshire History pages seem to be made by Nash Ford Publishing who reserv all right to the content. It's only my oppinion that lots of content seems to be from there. But maybe we can rearrange and rewrite the content so that it doesn't seem to be direct copying from that webiste?

--syvanen 19:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the explanation. I felt a limited portion of facts from the website gave a good picture for the Life at Court section. As you question whether I have done enough rewriting in my own words, what I suggest I do for now is to blank the Life at Court section, and then go to library and extract the same data directly from DNB, which I can do in a few days time when the library reopens. -- Op. Deo 19:22, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blanked all the little bits of copy and paste in the Life in Court section. I will recreate these in a few days when I have consulted the 1891 edition of DNB. Thanks, syvanen, for your help. -- Op. Deo 20:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now read the orginal article by William Arthur Jobson Archibald published in the 1894 DNB, and I can now confirm this contains the text which I used. Obviously the Berkshire History website was copied verbatum from the PD edition of the DNB, with a few changes to spellings and ommitting some parts. I will now add a few items back into the article directly from the 1894 public domain text. Op. Deo 13:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Articles requiring a direct DNB link]

The picture you have in this article is not Henry Norris, the supposed lover of Anne Boleyn, but his son, Sir Henry Norris, who was a courtier during Elizabeth I's reign.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Henry Norris (courtier)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I am confused about Norris's marital status. According to the Family section of the article, as well as the Tudor Place website, Norris was a widower at the time of his death. Yet the last paragraph speaks of his wife leaving a bracelet to her son nine years later.LizRoot25A (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)er was eens een jongen en hij stonk[reply]

Substituted at 17:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Norris (courtier). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413100427/http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/building/cultural-collections/archives/from-the-parliamentary-collections/parliamentary-collections/henry-norrys/ to http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/building/cultural-collections/archives/from-the-parliamentary-collections/parliamentary-collections/henry-norrys/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Norris (courtier). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055813/https://histfam.familysearch.org//getperson.php?personID=I62633&tree=EuropeRoyalNobleHous to https://histfam.familysearch.org//getperson.php?personID=I62633&tree=EuropeRoyalNobleHous

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]