Talk:Henry M. Jackson Visitor Center

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Merge; Notability

Please do not merge this article into Mt. Rainier National park or the Paradise page. There are several links to this specific page, and as the building is scheduled for destruction within a year or so, it will become less appropriate as a section in a more general page. There is plenty of historical information on this building/architecture, and I think it will be able to stand alone as its own article. Natevw (talk) 20:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this can stand alone - the architects are significant, and there aren't many volcano-shaped buildings around. I was going to create an article myself after doing Mission 66 but never got around to it. A picture would be nice to have. Acroterion _(talk) 20:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After significantly enlarging the article, I've taken the liberty of removing the merge tag. Hope that's not out of line; feel free to add it back if you aren't convinced. I do have some recent pictures of my own of the center and will try find one I can contribute. There are also a number of historical photos around (see references for starters) that could contribute to the article, but we'd have to figure out their copyright status. Natevw (talk) 22:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it is going somewhere, so I don't object to you removing the merge tag. However, the article is still in danger from the deletionists, as you still haven't established notability beyond a mention in the local newspaper. Surely there is a national fuss about its demolition? I suggest you make a copy on your userpage, just in case. In the meantime, lengthy summaries on the Paradise and Park page could be useful to readers. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 22:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I haven't found hard statistics for this visitor center itself, the center has been in a quite popular area of the park for over 40 years. The whole park has gotten between 1.5–2.5 million visitors a year ([1]) and, taking a percentage of those through the years, an incredible amount of people have visited or at least hiked around the building. According to http://www.nps.gov/mora/current/VSP.pdf, about 62% of Rainier visitors go to the Paradise area, and 53% of (total) visitors visited a visitor center. While I'm not sure if any of that is appropriate for the article itself, I think those numbers make a strong case for notability. (Other factors could be the significance within the Mission 66 project, the controversial modernist architecture, and the cultural significance even just as measured by amount of Google web results.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Natevw (talk • contribs) 23:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry M. Jackson Visitor Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013024203/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008246817_rainiervc10m.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008246817_rainiervc10m.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]