Talk:Hendrick's Gin

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"unique distillation" and "unlock the taste" make this sound like a commercial shill. (unsigned comment from DrHydeous)

But is so true. Tri 20:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Took out the unique.. and if there are 3 other Carter-Head Stills in the world, then it's a misnomer to call Hendrick's distillation unique. :) Rhobite 20:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

from dictionary.com "Usage Note: For many grammarians, unique is the paradigmatic absolute term, a shibboleth that distinguishes between those who understand that such a term cannot be modified by an adverb of degree or a comparative adverb and those who do not. These grammarians would say that a thing is either unique or not unique and that it is therefore incorrect to say that something is very unique or more unique than something else. Most of the Usage Panel supports this traditional view. Eighty percent disapprove of the sentence Her designs are quite unique in today's fashions. But as the language of advertising in particular attests, unique is widely used as a synonym for worthy of being considered in a class by itself, extraordinary and if so construed it may arguably be modified. In fact, unique appears as a modified adjective in the work of many reputable writers. A travel writer states that "Chicago is no less unique an American city than New York or San Francisco," for example, and the critic Fredric Jameson writes "The great modern writers have all been defined by the invention or production of rather unique styles." Although these examples of the qualification of unique are defensible, writers should be aware that such constructions are liable to incur the censure of some readers. See Usage Notes at absolute, equal, infinite." -Superbeecat 08:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really the number one selling gin in the US? It doesn't cite any sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.11.61.62 (talk) 20:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's extremely unlikely that Hendrick's is the #1 selling gin, so I removed this statement. If someone has a citation for this they're welcome to add it, but I'd be surprised if something like Gordon's wasn't the best selling gin. They certainly don't use Hendrick's for all those gin & tonics that people order. Rhobite (talk) 12:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hendrick's marketing actually brags that practically nobody drinks it, which is a good thing, they say, because it is so hard to make!--John Bessa (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the strength ? I'm not 100% sure but I think in the UK its 43ish and export is 47ish . Darwin-rover (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cocktails

Much to my surprise, I see cocktail recipes here in the WP. I am moving soon and have a bottle of it to finish as I don't want an open container in my car. I am finding that this booze defies mixing--the only diluter that makes sense being vermouth, which I find boring! Hendrick's site is no help; it just repeats other gin recipes. Any suggestions? If anyone has an orginal idea, we can extend it on the Wikiversity, which thrives on OR. --John Bessa (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Distillation

Do you find odd the fact that almost half of the article describes the difference between a pot styill and a Carter-Head still ? I think the section should concentrate on the product itself and details on the process should rather be presented in the pot still article. zubrowka74 17:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hendrick's Gin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV tagging?

This article has just been tagged for a "POV check", with the instruction to see this talk: page for an explanation of what's wrong with it. I can't see any such explanation. Nor can I see any POV issues. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]