Talk:Henderson Hall Historic District
Appearance
Henderson Hall Historic District has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 25, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Henderson Hall Historic District appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
( )
... that a wedding dress from 1802 is preserved at Henderson Hall Historic District (pictured)? [1]- ALT1:... that Henderson Hall Historic District (pictured) contains one of the oldest extant schools in West Virginia? [2] page 5
- ALT2 ... that a wedding dress from 1802 is preserved at Henderson Hall (pictured)? Same source as ALT0
- ALT1:... that Henderson Hall Historic District (pictured) contains one of the oldest extant schools in West Virginia? [2] page 5
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Napolioni Bolaca
- Comment: Greater than 7x expansion occurred between April 27 and May 1.
5x expanded by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 17:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC).
- The nominated article was hugely expanded within the week prior to its nomination. It is long enough and sourced well enough for DYK. No copyright violations or other issues bar it from being shown on the Main Page. Both hooks are formatted within the guidelines for DYK and backed up by references, though ALT0 might need some rewording since the wedding dress is in Henderson Hall (the building). Aside from that, the nomination is fine, QPQ has been done, and the image is suitable for the Main Page. Nice work so far, ❯❯❯ Mccunicano☕️ 02:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mccunicano: - Is the rephrased attempt better? Hog Farm Talk 02:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good. With that and my initial remarks, ALT1 and ALT2 are both good to go. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano☕️ 02:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Henderson Hall Historic District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 12:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. This looks like a big one - sorry you've been waiting a while! Ganesha811 (talk) 12:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hog Farm, this passes GA - congrats to you and anyone else who worked on the article. I'll do the needful now. Ganesha811 (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class Historic houses articles
- Low-importance Historic houses articles
- Historic houses articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class West Virginia articles
- Low-importance West Virginia articles
- WikiProject West Virginia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Urban studies and planning articles
- Low-importance Urban studies and planning articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles