Jump to content

Talk:Helen Magnus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHelen Magnus has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 19, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that actress Amanda Tapping accepted the part of Helen Magnus, the protagonist of Sanctuary, after she was encouraged to move on from her eleven-year role as Samantha Carter in Stargate?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Helen Magnus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Never heard of Sanctuary, but my younger self religiously tuned in to SG1 for Amanda Tapping...

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Just a few changes needed
    "The character is over a century and a half old, having been given her advanced longevity from injecting herself with vampire blood." -> should be "by injecting herself"
    "This allowed each member unique abilities." -> Probably should be "granted each member"
    "By the turn of the 20th century, her research with the abnormal population went into full swing and founded the Sanctuary Network." -> "and she founded..."
    "during which she decided to use the embryo an bear her daughter" -> "use the embryo to bear her daughter"
    "Despite this, Magnus believes her life energy might be in the shield buffer." -> I'm not really sure what this means.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    MOS is fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Citations are grand.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Scope is grand.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article is neutral.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are used well. One is commons, one is fair-use with a solid rationale.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Just going to hold this until the 1A fixes are sorted, then it should be ready to pass.
Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believed I have addressed all the issues. -- Matthew RD 16:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed the changes, and I'm passing this one. Well done! GRAPPLE X 21:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

[edit]

(I hope I'm entering this correctly.)

Was Helen Magnus really born in 1850? How about 1950?

Bmwbrucknerfan (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having read the article during my review, it states she was born in Victorian-era England and has extended her lifespan with vampire blood. She is a fictional character from a fantasy show, after all. GRAPPLE X 15:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct, also she said she is over 157 years old since the show's pilot. -- Matthew RD 17:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From the article: "In the second season her daughter, Ashley was killed off. The producers, as well as the American and Canadian networks to give the character, including Magnus, a deep and most dramatic impact." The second sentence is ill-formed and likely missing a word or two, but I have no idea what was intended. Can anyone correct this, please? 98.207.166.2 98.207.166.2 (talk) 03:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Helen Magnus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helen Magnus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]