Talk:Hedonism Resorts

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Jamaica portal This article is supported by WikiProject Jamaica (assessed as Low-importance).

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maps are both wrong

Westmoreland is on the south side of the island, on the west half. Both resorts are described here as being in Westmoreland yet neither dot is in Westmoreland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:EA00:107:3802:7DC3:C5F3:3564:16F7 (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFD result - keep

This article was nominated for deletion on December 12 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Rob e rt 00:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

I think that Hedonism provided the first template for a type of resort that is growing in popularity. I'm not personally going to be able to find the reliable sources to make the case for Hedonism being a historically important and influential resort, but I think the case could be made fairly strongly. With that potential, I think deleting the article would be a mistake. ike9898 (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hedonism resorts (II and the now closed III) as a cultural/historical site

I would tend to agree that the page could be allowed to stay up even with the closing of Hedo III, however it needs significant editing to make it worthy of an encyclopedic entry. There needs to be more content on its history and cultural significance or its impact on other resorts or sociological import since its creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohannVanbeek (talk • contribs) 14:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misdirection error

Right now there are two Hedonism Resorts pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_Resorts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_II

The second is titled Hedonism Resorts and indicates it is a redirect from Hedonism II. However, the content of the second page is not the same as the first. Recent edits in the first page are not reflected in the second page. There appears to be a problem with the redirect system. 35.9.35.242 (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hedonism Resorts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717093601/http://www.travelpulse.com/Resources/Editorial.aspx?n=71681 to http://www.travelpulse.com/Resources/Editorial.aspx?n=71681

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]