Talk:Heckler & Koch HK 51

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

help!

i need some help designing this page, i know alot about the weapon and want to make a page about it but i need help, feel free to pitch in!

Id like to but it seems this page doesnt seems to be a odd clone of a H&K weapon made by another company. I personaly dont see why we should keep it though.(ForeverDEAD 01:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

FWIW: The HK51 and HK51K have something of a cult following in the US NFA community, and several Class II manufacturers have offered the conversions. A British variant of this conversion actually made it into "Jane's Infantry Weapons" for many years: the FR Ordnance MC51. It was still featured in the 2006 edition. D.E. Watters 05:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I say we keep this article as the weapon is manufactured in the United states and is popular in some Firearms circles.Paulwharton 05:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MC51

Given that the weapons are of Identical design shouldn't the MC-51 and this article be merged?Paulwharton 05:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]