Talk:Heckler & Koch HK41
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ambiguity in the introduction
[edit]This sentence from the introduction's second paragraph is somewhat ambiguous "It is estimated that less than 400 HK41's were produced and even fewer imported in the U.S. for civilian consumption". Was the author attempting to state that only 400 HK41's were produced at all? Or is he saying that there were only 400 HK21s that were specifically produced for the US market and only some of those were actually imported? I would appreciate it if someone who is familiar with the subject could clarify the passage.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 20:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Article Title
[edit]The HK41 represented a small fraction of the H&K military-style rifles produced and sold, so why does "HK91" redirect to "HK41", and why is the article headed "HK41"? It should be the other way around. "HK41" is not a widely used or recognized name for these firearms, while "HK91" is the nomenclature used in advertising, laws, websites, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.2.128.73 (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Renamed?
[edit]This article makes no sense. HK91 redirects to HK41, but then he article just starts talking about the HK91, and the whole paragraph that mentions something about renaming the gun appears after that and is horribly written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettland (talk • contribs) 04:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Exactly. This article (and the one for "HK43") need renaming. The firearms being discussed are unknown, for the most part, under those names. The vast majority of their commercial sales, etc, was under the nomenclature of "HK91" and "HK93." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.56.155.107 (talk) 08:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
HKPRO
[edit]I have deleted a citation to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source. Rezin (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Heckler & Koch HK41. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060518045603/http://www.hkpro.com:80/hk41/hk41.htm to http://www.hkpro.com/hk41/hk41.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)