Talk:Heavenly sanctuary

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Article creation

This article will use a lot of religious jargon. Please try to explain terms, and make the article easily accessible to say, a non-Christian. Here is a brief discussion formerly from Wikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church about the requested creation of the article. Colin MacLaurin 07:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC):[reply]

heavenly sanctuary. In it, refer to articles such as Tabernacle (Judaism), Holy of Holies and heaven or similar. Would this be an Adventist-only page? Or would it work as a Christian theology page? Obviously for the Adventist POV it will mention investigative judgment. -Colin MacLaurin

If done, this would almost certainly be an Adventist focussed article. I'm not aware of any other denomination which teaches that there is a literal heavenly sanctuary, with 2 sections, a veil, an ark of the covenant etc. Tonicthebrown 07:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also starting to think it should be Adventist-specific. I thought of including other Christian views on heaven etc. and of course every Christian believes Christ is with God in heaven right now etc. Incidentally, according to my Avondale College lecturers, Adventist scholars today focus not on literal heavenly architecture but more on the meaning and "phases of ministry" etc., but I accept your point that much is probably uniquely Adventist. Colin MacLaurin 07:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've made a start... Tonicthebrown 07:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I had a stub created and then I noticed that the link had turned blue... Tonic had created the article! This is the second time - I think it was Ansell who beat me to create Association of Adventist Forums after my computer crashed, losing my unsaved written article :-( GJ though Tonic :) Colin MacLaurin 10:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content

Question: Is the "heavenly sanctuary" equivalent to "heaven" in Adventist understanding? Or do Adventists either not give an answer, or not agree on this? As I partially mentioned above, I understand that some changes in the church's understanding have happened, particularly since the Desmond Ford fiasco in 1980. While the investigative judgment in 1844 is still officially upheld, some details have changed. As I mentioned, there is less or no focus on heavenly architecture so to speak. Perhaps that in turn means that "heavenly sanctuary" is equivalent to "heaven", but I don't know. Someone please comment. A citation is needed, ultimately as this is an important point. Colin MacLaurin 10:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a quote from a conversation Heppenstall had with someone which I think we should include. It was made around the time of Ford's expulsion. He or someone said that while everyone was making a fuss over the date, others changed the event and no one even noticed. Colin MacLaurin 11:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another fact to look out for in the literature to find a citation: One expert told me that they don't believe we can narrow down the investigative judgement to the exact day of Oct 22, 1844. I suspect this is highly likely to citeable from any Adventist Society for Religious Studies (ASRS) members publications, and possibly but less likely from the Adventist Theological Society (ATS). If we can find a mainstream source, let's put that in. Colin MacLaurin 12:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another point: I understand that the church actually accepted some of Des Ford's initial claims. However Ford himself moved on in his beliefs, and this was no longer compatible with the church. This asserts there were some changes around 1980. This should be cited. Colin MacLaurin 12:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful....

Care needs to be taken not to leave editorial notes, helpful hints, and reminders of things that need to be done in the text of the article. Articles may not be finished, but they are not "draft" versions. Those notes should be listed on the talk page. It is also possible to leave instructions in the text without them being visible, just enclose them in

This also applies to other SDA related articles. They need to be cleaned up. -- Fyslee/talk 10:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I propose a merge between investigative judgment and heavenly sanctuary. I am not necessarily asserting the two topics are identical (although they possibly are); merely that they can be covered in the one article. For example in the 28 Fundamentals of Adventists, "24. Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary" states Christ's "atoning ministry" since 1844 "is a work of investigative judgment..." In the very least, the articles currently strongly overlap. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 03:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think they need to be kept separate but closely linked. The reason is that someone looking for Heavenly Sanctuary may not be looking for 'investigative judgment" and vise versa. Christian Skeptic (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But that still doesn't answer the question, because "Investigative judgment" could always redirect to a section of that title within "Heavenly sanctuary". Colin MacLaurin (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the merge proposal tags from both pages. One of my major concerns was that the different scopes would not be clearly defined. So: I have defined them! In particular, properly speaking "investigative judgment" is a subset of "heavenly sanctuary", even though the two are sometimes used interchangeably. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sanctuary doctrine is wider than the investigative judgement. The sanctuary covers the meaning of the Levitical rites as it relates to the work of Christ and the cross, the vindication of God's character, and the cleaning of sin from the universe. Marc Rasell 11:08, 18 January 2010 (GMT)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heavenly sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403153158/http://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/documents.htm to http://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/documents.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]