Talk:Heartstopper (graphic novel)

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Mention of bans on the book in the lede

Would it potentially be worthwhile to discuss the book's bans in the lede of the article? I usually try to be bold and make such changes myself and wait and see if people challenge them, but I do have questions about whether or not the inclusion of such information in the lede would constitute undue weight. I have seen bans of books with similar controversies widely visible in reliable sources like Gender Queer have them mentioned in their ledes, so I'm not sure if something similar should happen here, but I would like to open up a discussion to see what other editors think. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, there's a non-trivial amount of content covering the bans the book has faced in the body, so I think that merits at least a sentence in the lead. Go for it! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]