Talk:Heartbreak Anthem

Heartbreak Anthem has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 2, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in Heartbreak Anthem

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Heartbreak Anthem's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "iTunes":

From Conversations in the Dark: "Conversations in the Dark - Single by John Legend on Apple Music". Apple Music. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
From Shed a Light: „Shed a Light (feat. Cheat Codes) - Single“ von Robin Schulz & David Guetta auf Apple Music
From Flames (David Guetta and Sia song): "Flames - Single by David Guetta & Sia". iTunes Store. 22 March 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
From Hunter (Galantis song): "Hunter – Single by Galantis on Apple Music". iTunes Store (US). Retrieved 7 May 2017.
From Make It to Heaven: "Make It To Heaven (with Raye) - Single by David Guetta & MORTEN on Apple Music". iTunes Store. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
From Clap Your Hands (David Guetta and GlowInTheDark song): Clap Your Hands - Single de David Guetta & GLOWINTHEDARK sur iTunes
From 2U (David Guetta song): "2U (feat. Justin Bieber) - Single by David Guetta on Apple Music". iTunes Store (US). Retrieved 9 June 2017.
From Clean Bandit: "What Is Love? (Deluxe) by Clean Bandit on Apple Music". Apple Music. Retrieved 28 September 2018.
From Bones (Galantis song): "Bones – Single by Galantis & OneRepublic on Apple Music". iTunes Store (US). Retrieved 13 April 2019.
From Another Life (Afrojack and David Guetta song): "Another Life (feat. Ester Dean) [Radio Mix] - Single by Afrojack & David Guetta on Apple Music". iTunes Store (US). Retrieved 22 May 2017.
From Let's Love (David Guetta and Sia song): "Let's Love - Single by David Guetta & Sia". Archived from the original on 12 September 2020. Retrieved 18 September 2020 – via Apple Music.
From Like I Do (David Guetta, Martin Garrix and Brooks song): "Like I Do (Remixes) [Soonvibes Contest] - EP by David Guetta, Martin Garrix & Brooks on Apple Music". iTunes Store. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
From Club Can't Handle Me: "Club Can't Handle Me – Single by Flo Rida". iTunes. June 28, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2010.
From Thing for You: "Thing For You - Single by David Guetta & Martin Solveig". Apple Music. Retrieved 19 July 2019.
From Rich Boy (song): "Rich Boy – Single by Galantis on iTunes". iTunes. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
From Never Be Alone: "Never Be Alone (feat. Aloe Blacc) – Single by David Guetta & MORTEN". Apple Music. Retrieved 19 July 2019.
From No Worries (Disciples and David Guetta song): No Worries - Single by Disciples & David Guetta on iTunes
From Pillow Fight (song): "Pillow Fight – Single by Galantis on Apple Music". iTunes Store (US). Retrieved 7 May 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The song's "rearrangement"

I noticed that someone added that the song originally contained former Little Mix member Jesy Nelson's vocals and was later cut out after she left the band without a source. I tried finding a source to support it and I am not sure if either of these are reliable, so I ask for someone's thoughts about these following sources:

"Little Mix's Heartbreak Anthem originally featured Jesy Nelson". MusicNews.com. Retrieved 2022-01-20.
"Little Mix's new song Heartbreak Anthem was 'rearranged' after Jesy Nelson quit, Galantis reveals". Flipboard. Retrieved 2022-01-20.
"Little Mix's Heartbreak Anthem originally featured Jesy Nelson". MSN. Retrieved 2022-01-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
"Little Mix 'rearranged' Heartbreak Anthem after Jesy Nelson quit". Metro. 2021-05-20. Retrieved 2022-01-20.

Your help would be greatly appreciated, thank you! ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 05:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Heartbreak Anthem/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grk1011 (talk · contribs) 12:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner, I will be reviewing this for you! I will review and comment section by section below this message and will update the above checklist as items are addressed. I do on occasion make slight copyedits as I go (no sense in me wasting your time with spelling or grammar concerns!). Typically this is an iterative process between the nominator and the reviewer, so feel free to ask questions. Grk1011 (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Per MOS:LEAD, references are typically not included in the lead. The lead should summarize the article, so everything in these few paragraphs should also be included somewhere in the article body with the appropriate refs. Refs 5 through 9 are only used in the lead, so that's an indication to me that the article might be missing information in the body.
Add a year or date for the performance on the Confetti Tour for context. Done
The genres are only sourced in the infobox. Is there a way to incorporate some of that into the background and release section to help provide additional context?

Background and release

Add the missing info from the lead here. Done
Per WP:METRO, the Metro ref will need an alternative. Done
The song appearing on the Little Mix album is missing a ref. Done

Critical reception

Add a summary/intro sentence to start this section. Was all the reception positive or does this article only include positive reviews? Check since cherry-picking reviews is somewhat common. Done

Accolades

Add a couple summary sentences to introduce this section. Include any discussion about the song's inclusion in these award shows
The Brit Awards link is dead. Done

Commercial performance

WP:SONGS lists this section as "Chart performance" instead Done
I'd suggest regrouping the first two paragraphs a bit. Have one focus solely on the UK. You opened with performance in several countries but then only focused on UK and then only on the UK in the second paragraph.
Wikilink Mediabase. Check the others in this sentence for wikipedia articles as well.
"at numbers four and six, respectively". Done
Clarify the last sentence of the first paragraph. I was confused about how the tenth week meant 100 weeks. The ref says across all of their releases.
I believe the year-end list table should instead be in the chart section.

Music video

The Youtube views bit does not have a reference, but overall, figures like this that require constant updating should be avoided. (remove it) Done
Was there any media reception to the video? Done

Track listing

The release history also has 2 other versions. Where are those? Done

Personnel

Start this section with Credits adapted from... with a ref (typically this is from Tidal, the liner notes, etc). Done
Wikilink first mention of each role if applicable Done

Release history

Can you make it clear that these were "various"? Typically this is done with a summary ref that includes a sampling of different countries. See S&M (song)#Release history for an example. (I typically see 4 countries per summary ref as a rule of thumb)

General comments

Be consistent with number format, i.e. ten and 10.
Check all refs for missing authors (I noticed a couple that do have listed authors, but they're not included in the ref).
Be consistent with ref formatting. There are instances of "www.officialcharts.com" and "Official Charts Company" between individual refs even though these are the same source. Also make sure you are italicizing or not when appropriate. I advocate for every ref having the wikilink to the source's article (if applicable) as a courtesy for the reader.
Copyright detector only flagged the quote, so that's good! [1]
We only spot check refs (and especially when it's a "claim" is being made), so please check the remaining refs to ensure they are all working. I did identify one dead link, noted above. You can also use the "fix dead links" button, which you can find by clicking on "view history" and then it's listed above the revisions amongst other external tools.

JackReynoldsADogOwner: And that's all for now. Please take a look at these items and let me know if you have any questions! Grk1011 (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remaining comments

@JackReynoldsADogOwner: I can't tell if you're waiting on me or still working on edits, but I've read through the article again and have the following remaining comments:

I'd combine the composition section as the opening for "Background and release". A standalone section with one sentence feels incomplete. This still feels relevant there.
What was the website for the teaser link? helloitsmeyourex.com? The ref only backs up Little Mix's posting of it, not all three.
Still missing the ref for Between Us". Should be easy to track down. Done
Intro sentence still needed for Critical Reception section. Done

Could look through all the comments above for both reviews and add Done as you complete them (or alternatively Not done if you object and have comments back to me!) Thanks. Grk1011 (talk) 13:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner: will you be able to finish this by the end of the weekend? Grk1011 (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grk1011: Yes I can. Sorry. I've been busy with personal situations. But yes I should. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 03:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner: checking in. Grk1011 (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner: checking in again. This GA review process usually takes about a week and it's now been over a month. I think you're very close though! Grk1011 (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner: I've gone through and made some minor edits to get this to GA status given your disappearance. It was already close enough. Grk1011 (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.