Jump to content

Talk:He That Believeth in Me/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I've never reviewed a TV episode before but I've checked out a long line of other episode GA articles and the MOS and all so let's get to it.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There is one whole section unsourced - "Plot", it's usually got at least 1 citation in what I've seen.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Looks in order to me
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    I see activity connected with GA preparations and that's it
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

It's one tiny thing and then I'll approve it, good work. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I'm just confused about the "tiny" thing that needs to be done. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you want me to find a source for the plot. I'll see this page soon, as I am going to college today and may not be back until tonight. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No need for confusion, you got it right, a source for the plot section would really be good. No rush the traditional hold period is up to a week so don't worry. MPJ-DK (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it's just that I thought plots don't need citations. However, I think I know where to find a reliable source. I'll have it done within the next few minutes (depending on how fast the internet at home is going). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Completed. I trust this will do :) -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw a few GAs have a source on that section, figured it was a good idea. I'm giving it the GA status now. Well done, really excellent job.MPJ-DK (talk) 01:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:He_That_Believeth_in_Me/GA1&oldid=276170717"