This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Perhaps this should be moved into the Harris myCFO-titled article (with myCFO redirecting there), since that is now the official name of the company per the homepage. 24.90.11.62 17:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
We would like to request that the material relating to myCFO, which is prior history to the current owners/company (Harris myCFO) be removed from the Harris myCFO article. The myCFO information is already captured under that name, why should it appear in full twice, and in relationship to a completely different company. Thank you for your consideraton of this request.Harris myCFO (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, this page is just HarrisMyCFO fanboy nonsense. This does not represent a neutral point of view and I've never ever seen a wikipedia page set up like this, it looks like they just tried to replicate the company website! Anyway, obviously some fans of Harris MyCFO did this, and I understand because they are absolutely a top-flight private banking outfit. I follow private banking and I would rank Harris #3 behind Coutts and US Trust, but HarrisMyCFO definitely has the most annoying fans of all the famous private banks. Somebody needs to fix this and provide a more balanced assessment.
173.255.174.217 (talk) 06:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]