Jump to content

Talk:Harlem Park Three

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeHarlem Park Three was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 17, 2023Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 1, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Harlem Park Three were awarded US$48 million, the largest sum in Baltimore history, after being falsely imprisoned for murder?


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 18:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by ClydeFranklin (talk). Self-nominated at 22:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Harlem Park Three; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: NA Graearms (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harlem Park Three/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WritingAboutCreepypastas (talk · contribs) 13:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Nominator has told me on Discord that they are fixing up some rough edges. WritingAboutCreepypastas (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Queen of Hearts: Would you like to start the review? WritingAboutCreepypastas (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WritingAboutCreepypastas, you've caught me at the wrong time. I've been suffering from unexpected medical issues. If I don't start this by the end of the week, please close this as unsuccessful. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (no relation) 18:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This looks good and the text was very easy-to-follow. I removed some contractions, but other than that it should be good for GA pending some spotchecks. Comprehensiveness isn't in the purview of GA, but I wondered if there was more about the case considering there are only 11 refs?

It's been almost 2 weeks, I lost interest, real life got in the way,  Request withdrawn. I might later resubmit this in a better state. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 05:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.