Talk:Hanna Cavinder/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 08:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 08:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 17.4% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
• No previous GA reviews.

General comments

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • No problems were found in the lede.
  • No problems were found in the rest of the article.
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Add alt texts to the images in the article.
  • The short description has 74 characters and most short descriptions have 40 or fewer characters. Cavinder is known for being a basketball player and social media personality, though, most of the article actually covers her basketball career. What about changing the short description to "American former basketball player"?
    • The first line of her biography has the following text;{{Short description|American social media personality and former basketball player (born 2001)}}-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
      • That short description has more than 40 characters, so it should be shortened. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
• Checking ref, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
  • No referencing issues.
  • Most of the listed references are reliable, however:
    • Ref 19, 20, 26, 30, 33, 39, 40 are dead URLs.
      • Found archives at internetarchive.org.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Ref 29 missing website parameter.
      • Added-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Ref 45 and 46 is NYPOST which is unreliable.
      • Swapped 45-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
      • Swapped 46-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Ref 74 is Forbes but the writer is a part of their staff so it passes.
    • Her height (in the infobox) is unsourced. FYI Ref 44 does cover this, so please add the ref next to it.
      • I am using https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/hanna-cavinder-1.html, but I am not sure how to cite a two part parameter.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

      I've added it for you. Vacant0 (talk) 08:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

  • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 21, 34, 44, 60, 63, 74–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • The article addresses the main aspects and it stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
• Checking images.
  • All looks good, images are properly licensed.

Final comments

@TonyTheTiger: The article will be on hold for a week so that you can fix these issues that I've pointed out in the review. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Vacant0, as I understand your review, the only changes that I see are needed is to replace dead URLs. Let me know if I am missing anything.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I've noted everything that you should do above, this is to: add alt texts to images, shorten the short description to 40 or less characters, fix the 7 dead URLs, replace New York Post sources with reliable sources, and add a source for her height. Vacant0 (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I've striked what has been completed so far. Once these two more issues get fixed, I'll promote the article to GA status. Vacant0 (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@TonyTheTiger: It's been a week since this GA review has started and all issues related to GA criteria have been addressed. I'll promote the article to GA status now but I'd like to see alt texts added and the short desc shortened (less than 40 characters). Vacant0 (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.