This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Habits (Stay High) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was copy edited by Ian Waithaka, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 February 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
The article of this page should be "Habits (Stay High)" instead of "Habits (Tove Lo song)" since the former is currently the official one and is widely used in many record charts.
These two songs should be separated since they are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT singles. First, "Habits (Hippie Sabotage remix)" has been renamed as "Stay High" and became another single. Second, the lyrics of these two songs are also very different according to MetroLyrics. You can take a look: Habits Lyrics and Stay High Lyrics. Third, per WP:SIZESPLIT and WP:NSONG. The article of the remix is long enough and the remix single is notable enough to have its own page. --U990467 (talk) 17:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Paparazzzi
I think the article should be titled "Habits (Stay High)", not just "Habits". "Habits" was the title of the first single release. The second one was "Habits (Stay High)", and it is mainly known with that title.
In my opinion, despite being two different singles, both "Habits (Stay High)" and the remix should be covered in one single article, since they are the same song.
The lyrics are "different" because, well, one of them is a remix, Hippie Sabotage only used the bridge and the chorus of the original track and made the beat slower. --Paparazzzi (talk) 04:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
obviously any move to a (stay high) version should be run through a proper RM since it was expressly rejected twice above. I also don't see much justification for a split since they're one song — Amakuru (talk) 06:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
WP:NATURAL: Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title.
First, this single has been released twice: the first time, as "Habits", and the second one, as "Habits (Stay High)". As "Habits", the song failed to chart anywhere, while as "Habits (Stay High)" was a commercial success, which could indicate that the second title is better known.
Support: The article of this page should be "Habits (Stay High)" instead of "Habits (Tove Lo song)" since the former is currently the official one and is widely used in many record charts. --U990467 (talk) 06:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
An edit comment requested an explanation of the calculation. Here it is: The song consists of 3 choruses. Each chorus consists of three "A-sections" (the chorus is has an AABA-structure). Each A-section contains two Millennial whoops. This results in 3 x 3 x 2 = 18 Millennial whoops. Or one can listen to the song from start to end and calculate them one by one. --Bensin (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This is an example of one of the proper quotes in the page it uses correct quotation after the period."I can't lie. What I'm singing about is my life. It's the truth. I've had moments where [drug-taking] has been a bigger part than it should be. It's hard to admit to, and I could filter it or find another metaphor for it – but it doesn't feel right to me." These quotes on the other hand are bad because the punctuation is after the quotation marks. 1)"You're gone and I gotta stay high / All the time, to keep you off my mind". 2) "was really coming from the heart". 3) "the dark undertone is key for the whole video". When it should be 1)"You're gone and I gotta stay high / All the time, to keep you off my mind." 2) "was really coming from the heart." 3) "the dark undertone is key for the whole video." Showcrasher (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how 'Mainstream Radio', 'Adult album alternative', etc. constitute release formats. Surely this column should have things like 'Digital download', 'CD', etc.? --Michig (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]