Talk:HVDC Vancouver Island

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help!

Description of Line

Can someone living in area of Vancouver describe the course of the line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.246.212 (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updated 7 Sept 2021

Facility still in use

There were rumours that it was planned to shut this HVDC link down. Is this true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.139.109.140 (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2005 VITR hearings filed that facilities were at end-of-life and the VITR 230kV project was to functionally replace it.^[1] Poles 1 and 2 were de-energized in 2014. Overhead and submarine segments still in place as of 2021. Overhead segments may be re-used; submarine cables would have to be replaced.

References

^ https://www.bcuc.com/Documents/Proceedings/2005/DOC_7818_B1-1%20(Part%201%20of%202)%20VITR%20CPCN%20Application%20and%20Appx%20A-D.pdf

Thyristor valves

Should this be Thyratron? Synthetic Woolly Mammoth (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, Thyristor is correct.

The word valves is commonly (in some parts of the world) used for thyratrons, but not for thyristors. Since I am not in that part of the world, I am not completely sure, but I think it should not say valves if it is thyristor. Gah4 (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.bcuc.com/Documents/Proceedings/2005/DOC_7818_B1-1%20(Part%201%20of%202)%20VITR%20CPCN%20Application%20and%20Appx%20A-D.pdf

[1]