Talk:HMS Zealous (1864)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: — Iune(talk) 23:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The article is basically a Good Article. However, I feel that there are a few minor details to "fix".
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- A. Prose quality:
- HMS Zealous was given a straight stem – Does this mean the bow of the ship? If so, what does it mean for the "bow" to be straight?
- ...converted to an armoured frigate for the price of £239,258. – Is this in 1862 pounds?
- Her bottom had not been cleaned since she had left Great Britain... – When was the cleaning?
- Linked. Stems of wooden warships and the earliest ironclads were generally curved outward.
- Yes, see the note for the converted cost.
- It was cleaned before she commissioned.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Passed — Iune(talk) 00:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)