Talk:HMS Zealous (1864)

HMS Zealous (1864) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Public domain images

There are a few public domain images available at BC Archives. Once trimmed of their BC Archives borders, the images are usable with the license {{PD-Canada}}.Skookum1 (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also here:

[1]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Zealous (1864)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: — Iune (talk) 23:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

The article is basically a Good Article. However, I feel that there are a few minor details to "fix".

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

HMS Zealous was given a straight stem – Does this mean the bow of the ship? If so, what does it mean for the "bow" to be straight?
...converted to an armoured frigate for the price of £239,258. – Is this in 1862 pounds?
Her bottom had not been cleaned since she had left Great Britain... – When was the cleaning?
- Linked. Stems of wooden warships and the earliest ironclads were generally curved outward.
- Yes, see the note for the converted cost.
- It was cleaned before she commissioned.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed — Iune (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]