Talk:HMS Woolwich (F80)

HMS Woolwich (F80) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 11, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Woolwich (F80)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 11:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No disambiguation links (no action required)
No duplicate links (no action required)
Checklinks report 403 error for one of the links, however the link itself works (no action required)
Image used is non-free, but tagged with appropriate fair use rationale (no action required)
Referencing is fine

MOS and prose:

Should 4 in 4-inch (102 mm) gun be spelled out similar to {two-pounder guns?
I'd prefer changing Also during the war several radars were added. to "Several radars were also added during the war."
When I read ... while circumnavigating Africa, she had to put into Mombasa, Kenya for repairs to her boilers before she arrived in November., I was wondering where was she sailing to. Even though the first part of the sentence says she was deployed to the Med, knowing little on the RN in the WWII, I assumed a ship would sail from the UK to the Med via Gibraltar. It took me a moment to realise that ships might have been compelled to circumnavigate Africa to reach Suez. Perhaps it would be prudent to end the sentence in "... before she arrived in Alexandria in November." (or whichever port it was she reached). I'm not bent on this one, but thought to point out a possible point of confusion among non-expert readers.
Lead is on a shorter side, but within provisions of WP:LEAD (no action required)

Overall, a nice article with little (if anything) to mend before it is passed.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, all issues addressed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All clear then. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]